Asdfghjkl1234554321 • 5 yr. ago. It's the time your games are showcased on lichess tv. I usually see it on high rated bullet players. professor_mcamateur • 5 yr. ago. whaaa?! so if i recovered my password and username would i be able to see what got featured when? and why? if i remember correctly my rating went down from the start and held ...Best. Cabernet2H2O • 2 yr. ago. You don't need a chess.com membership. Everything and more is out there for free. But if you can afford it, won't really miss the money and actually use it and enjoy it, it's worth it. I really don't get these questions. You can get a free trail, or pay for a month, to decide for your self.While in lichess, you can only change the speed of the piece animation. VARIANTS: Chess.com - Chess.com has more variants. Including my favorite, bughouse. CHATTING: Lichess.org - Lichess has notifications on when your friends message you, and it's just easier to talk on there. Two of the most popular chess websites are chess.com and lichess.org.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ...Lichess inflation. Most people agree that lichess ratings are inflated by around 300-ish points. I moved to lichess from chess.com a while ago for better analysis and prep, and have gotten considerably stronger since then. I'm around 1900 lichess rapid. I'd assumed this equated to 1500-1600 chess.com.Best. Cabernet2H2O • 2 yr. ago. You don't need a chess.com membership. Everything and more is out there for free. But if you can afford it, won't really miss the money and actually use it and enjoy it, it's worth it. I really don't get these questions. You can get a free trail, or pay for a month, to decide for your self.I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really …So I've been playing puzzles on all 3. I like Lichess puzzles because of their themes. Especially the advanced ones but I find them easier than chesstempo. I also find chess.com in general easier. Although I find myself playing 1200 elo puzzles when my puzzle elo is 1500. Funny enough I am rated ~1200950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Bullet on lichess vs chess.com . I got a new phone, iPhone 13 recently. For some reason when I play bullet on chess.com every move seems like it lags ever so slightly, which it doesn't do on lichess for me. I was playing in an arena last night on chess.com and I lost so ...The puzzles aren't harder on lichess but the puzzle elo on lichess is more realistic. You'll get equivalent hard puzzles on chess.com but your rating appears to be higher. Yes, though I also enjoy the conceptual/composed puzzles on chesscom. In a funny way they compliment each other. The most difficult are on chesstempo.You can't really use rating comparisons as a measurement for one site having harder opponents than the other. As they both use different rating system and those differences is why you have a higher elo on lichess than on chess.com. Instead I tend to look more at my percentile, being 2100 on lichess means im "better than 95.6%" of players where as on chess.com 2000 elo had me above 99% lol.The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more! The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed.Similar to how (usually at least) online and OTB FIDE scores will be different. That's true. Lichess uses 1500 as the starting rating because that's what the Glicko system recommends. You can't compare the percentiles though. 95th percentile on Lichess rapid would be 2100 and a 2100 on Lichess would be much stronger than a 1500 on Chess.com.All you have to do is type in your username and it will calculate the estimate based on a combination of your bullet, blitz, rapid, and classical (Lichess only) ratings. They are weighted so that the time controls you play most frequently (i.e. the ones with the lowest RD value) affect your estimate the most. The estimates are based off of data ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. How good is the cheating detection at Chess.com vs Lichess? Am a casual so would prefer to use the site that has a better/superior cheating detection system. I had accounts for both sites but don't want have the willpower to figure out if the player is cheating.Lichess vs Chess.com style of play. Does anyone find that the style of chess is different between the two platforms? I know the ranking is different, as my score is about +400 on lichess, but I also find the style of play is different too. Chess.com seems more reserved to me.On Lichess.org I hover around ~1350-1450 on Rapid 10+0 games, but on Chess.com I can't get past 1150. Are the rankings different? The level of players? Or because I've almost exclusively played on Lichess.org the past few years - I seldom play games in real life - that my brain isn't used to the board? Thanks!Chess.com standard is roughly in line with USCF, Lichess is 200-300 points higher. I think chess.com rating is more like +/- 300 that of FIDE. But as someone else noted, lichess's ratings are inflated. Chess.com has more members and I think that plays some role in the rating score you have.Basically, I played some chess after a long time off (many months) bc of school etc. I used to be 2200ish lichess rapid — I made a chesscom account for fun and pretty easily got to above that rating in the rapid pool, where "2200"s were dropping basic knight forks and basic deflection tactics with plenty of time on the clock, in pretty simple positions.I definitely agree about the ratings though. My ICC Rating is 1250 and my lichess rating is 1700. I cannot comment on Chess.com, because I haven't played there in a few years. Gixx • 8 yr. ago. I have very little experience (1100 games on FICS - 5 2 blitz) and 80 games on lichess (15 2 time). I'm rated 1000 on FICS, and 1420 on lichess. For instance facing a 1500 on Chess.com is pretty manageable as long as you're thinking, but facing a 1200 on Chess Arena feels like I'm playing a 1800-2000 player from Chess.com. I'm not the best, but I've beaten a few 2000/2100 players, drawn against some national master players, and generally have no worries playing anyone under like 1500.1. Scyther99 • 1 yr. ago. I played a lot of puzzles on both sites and I like Lichess puzzles a lot more, because they are more realistic and varied imo. Chess.com puzzles are more flashy, usually some kind a sacrifice, so I immediately look for those kind of things. Liches puzzles are more often quiet moves, winning a pawn to win favourable ... What this means varies though - chess.com has a huge player base, so 50th percentile there will incorporate an awful lot of casual players and dead accounts etc - whereas lichess for example, has a smaller playerbase, …CHESS.COM vs LICHESS ... Sort: Oldest shanidshaan5678 May 24, 2021 0 #1 In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit Hamnder663 May 24, 2021 0 #2I think for these validated players - maybe pulling their historical lichess ratings and their historical FIDE ratings could help enlarge the sample size. AnnualUse9202 • 2 yr. ago. I like this analysis. My peak ratings: LiChess Blitz = 1953 * 0.9074 + 41.4256 = 1814. LiChess Rapid = 2075 * 0.7962 + 309.9946 = 1962.There are 1,000 puzzles to play in the $4 paid version of Shredder Chess on iOS. The free version, Shredder Chess Lite, limits you 100 puzzles. The full version of Shredder Chess on Android is $3. ...Maybe try correspondence chess too on Lichess (remember, the non-engine analysis board + opening book is allowed; click around). ... Too much reddit isn't going to have you getting better at chess (if that's your objective). * I think 10+0 is okay to play at too, but don't cry or complain if you find yourself in a bit of a losing streak. Play ...There seems to be a consensus that the player pool on Chess.com is #1 stronger, and that #2 the ratings on Lichess are super inflated. What I'm confused about is the fact that Chess.com says that in Blitz my percentile rank is 64.1%. My rating is around 1024. On Lichess percentile rank is most commonly about 44% as of the last few months.It has way more stuff than lichens, lessons, drills, daily puzzles, chess engine (and yes, I did do a comparison. I used the Chess.com engine against the lichess stockfish engine, and the chess.com engine reacted much faster and did better than stockfish 8 in lichess). And also, some other game modes like puzzle battle and 4 player chess.lichess - actual infinite analysis made by free engine for free, actual premoves. chesscom - analysis are total trash that even 1800 elo moves are often missed because of 15 depth which is like 0,05 seconds of thinking (still by the same free engine btw, so you pay for using free engine analysis of your game, you can simply download it btw, so this is more or less scamming), premoves are ...Chess.com and lichess use different rating systems, and give different ratings to new players. Chess.com ratings end up being consistently lower, but that doesn't correspond to you being in a lower percentile of players on chess.com (what parent was talking about). For reference though, I'm 2000 lichess rapid, and 1700 chess.com rapid.Real estate is often portrayed as a glamorous profession. Real estate agents, clients and colleagues have posted some hilarious stories on Reddit filled with all the juicy details about the most out-of-the-ordinary things they have experien...Lichess is 1000 years ahead in technology. For Lichess, the pawns on b7 and g7 look like cute little mice, so I'm gonna have to go with Lichess. Lichess is better but Chess. com has copious amounts of cash. Obv. chess.c*m is better as lichess' arrows have little gaps as …Download Free Study Plans Lichess Rating vs. Chess.com Last Updated: 1/1/2023 How does your chess.com rating compare to your lichess.org rating? The data …I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.A good strategy could be "play blitz until you are stuck at some rating point then play rapid for some time and come back to blitz to see if you improved". For me, maintaing a gap of around 150 in blitz and rapid rating works good (with blitz < rapid) (whenever the gap is disturbed, i try to stabilize the gap). I play on lichess.Basically, I played some chess after a long time off (many months) bc of school etc. I used to be 2200ish lichess rapid — I made a chesscom account for fun and pretty easily got to above that rating in the rapid pool, where “2200”s were dropping basic knight forks and basic deflection tactics with plenty of time on the clock, in pretty simple positions.Chess.com's 'standard' ratings are an OK approximation for USCF ratings, which are a little inflated compared to FIDE. Based on this and comparison of Chess.com vs Lichess ratings, I'd say that your real life Elo would be between 1700 and 1800. hicetnunc1972. I'd say around 1800 OTB in raw strength, but the time-controls are different so it ...Lichess is basing it on active players where as chess.com is basing it on all players. Orcahhh. Not really. Chesscom players are just considered active for longer (3 months instead of 1 week) 1 yr. ago. lichess players are just better. __Jimmy__ 1 yr. ago. You know, being called "chess.com" is pretty OP for advertising.I actually started playing Chess thanks to Lichess' simplistic nature. I would just go to Lichess, press the big button "Play with Friend", choose a time control, accept and send them the link. It was so easy, that I started doing it more and more out of boredom and eventually starting to take Chess seriously.Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. 1600-1800 Elo. Im 1900 on lichess and 1700 on chess.com. I think around 200-300 points are average.The chess.com puzzles have kinda bizarre ratings , they don't make much sense until you get over 2000 . Some of the ones rated 400 or even lower can have a trick to it, and many of the ones between about 1400-1900 are "do this aggressive looking move and the problem ends", where it is actually quite a lot of work to correctly calculate that that is the best move.FM NobodyReally. #10. Lichess is soooo much better than chess.com. I had a free lifetime diamond account on chess.com which I voluntarily closed for fear of throwing up every time I logged in. Due to their totally disgusting, despicable, insufferable, dictatorial policies. CC is completely overrun by trolls.Also you can make a chesscom account even with sites like fakemail, whereas on lichess you cant, you need a reputable site like gmail. Kamsky says lichess sucks because of his partnership with chess.com. Lichess recently updated their cheat detection system. this implies chesscom has the working detection system.I played at least 12 games (appears to be minimum for Lichess to remove the provisional tag) on both Lichess and Chess.com and had the following records and ratings: Chess.com: Bullet: 661 17-8 Blitz: 675 18-8 Rapid: 730 10-2 Lichess: ... several subreddits are protesting against the new Reddit API pricing and its implications for 3rd-party ...Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...lichess vs chess.com Hello chess friends, I haven't actually heard of lichess until i saw that some of you players played there. To the lichess players, was there anything about lichess that you think is better than something on chess.com. Genuinely curious on whether or not I should switch, I see a lot of people cheat on chess.com 12 commentsMy puzzle rating is around 1600. Rapid 1100, bullet 1000 and today passed 1000 in blitz for the first time! I'm pretty much the exact same as you haha. Hi pretty much the exact same as you haha, I'm dad. Nice! I don't have a rapid or bullet rating as I've played less than 4 rated games in each and it was awhile ago.The difference between lichess and chess.com. Difference between making money versus open source. One is an actual business, the other is volunteer based. Pros and cons to each. I don't particularly like chess com but it actually brings people in to chess and makes it money. The WC for example lichess didn't have an excellent commentary team ...At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ...Online chess = Garbage. Don't give any money or energy to lichess.con or chess.con. The negative mind spaces you will visit after playing so many cheats is not worth your beautiful energy or well being. Play over-the-board. The battle for energy will at least be fair. Thank me later :) Peace <3 1 week later: The cheat is still not banned.iamspookydooky • 6 mo. ago. chess.com is better for beginners because of its quick analysis / lessons and has better scheduled tournaments. lichess can offer similar analysis for free, albeit likely more cumbersome for a newbie. Services vs. free is the choice you're making. Both are excellent, many people use both. [deleted] • 6 mo. ago. On Lichess, your rating starts at 1500 and your RD starts at 350. The rating system starts you out saying "This player is probably somewhere between 1150 and 1850." Each player also has a volatility, which basically gauges how often the player performs at the expected outcome. For example, if a 1200 player faces a 2000 player and wins, their ...nyubet •. Lichess has for free everything that chess.com offers for the most expensive membership. Being a Lichess patreon ("premium" equivalent, but not really) does not offer any other services, everything will be the exact same, the only difference being that you are making an optional donation which allows the site to keep working for ...The short answer is Chess.com is better if you subscribe to the top tier diamond subscription. Lichess still is useful, but the Chess.com lessons, tactics (puzzles), videos, and drills are better. I also prefer the analysis feature. Lichess is awesome because it is free. I like chess.com but their server is crap. Lichess has a better, cleaner more user friendly layout and I’ve never had any issues with their servers, so for this reason I use lichess. As far as the difference in numerical ranking goes: just pay attention to percentile, it gives you a better idea of where you’re at.Lichess has always started players at a rating of 1500, the recommendation of the Glicko system. For several years, chess.com started players at a rating of 1200, despite also using the Glicko system. This difference in their ratings has largely persisted, at higher or lower levels the difference in player strength on the two websites is about ...Lichess seems to have more cheats over 2000. Many times I have played a 2200-2300 who gets banned, soon enough. The cheaters on lichess seem clustered in the 1650-1800 range. But yeah I think people are playing the opening 10-15 moves then switching the engine on when they get in trouble. I've had similar experiences. So grosso modo the ranking difference between lichess and chess dot com is about 400 points. It's more like 200-300 points unless you're very low rated. The higher rated you are, the smaller the difference is. It's almost exactly 300 point difference at lichess 1200, but then at 2300 it's exactly 200 points.Basically, I played some chess after a long time off (many months) bc of school etc. I used to be 2200ish lichess rapid — I made a chesscom account for fun and pretty easily got to above that rating in the rapid pool, where "2200"s were dropping basic knight forks and basic deflection tactics with plenty of time on the clock, in pretty simple positions.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Starting ... I played at least 12 games (appears to be minimum for Lichess to remove the provisional tag) on both Lichess and Chess.com and had the following records and ratings: Chess.com: Bullet: 661 17-8 Blitz: 675 18-8 Rapid: 730 10-2 Lichess: ...Lichess is great. Love the interface. Studies for annotating your games or notes on games are great. It will also make you think you are awesome at chess. My rating on lichess is like 500 elo higher than chess.vo. or chess24, which are much closer in rating.Chess.com vs Lichess.org - The ultimate comparison 1. Interface and Design: - Chess.com has a polished and professional interface, with various themes, …I use chess.com but have accounts on both. It's purely by habit though, since I started on chess.com I just keep going back. Lichess is probably the better site, the community on Chess.com is kinda mean, a lot of salty and trash talking people haha.Edit: 2200 on chess.com is nowhere near 2400-2500 on lichess youre delusional, its 2350 at MOST. i am on lichess on bullet, blith, rapid and calssical 1700-1800, but on chess my ratingsare around 1150 no joke lol, my highest rating on chess.com is classical which is around 1320. Play more and you will get better, also the younger you are, the ...Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app.Chess.com👎 •1000 ads •hard to use, Not use friendly •Askes for money, and help, annoys players! Gives 100000 messages per day! •Show offs, advertises!!! •Sells ads to non-premium accounts! And premium accounts pays money so all people are helping them make profit 💀 _____ Lichess is a free (really), libre, no-ads, open source ...Short Answer: No. Longer Answer: lichess.org and chess.com are two different chess platforms with different rating systems. Lichess uses the Glicko-2 rating method while chess.com uses Glicko, hence a player's rating is not the same on the two sites. It has nothing to do with players' strength.Chess.com arguably has a lot more smurfs and cheaters than Lichess. But on to the basic note, Lichess ratings are just more inflated than Chess.com’s. Everyone is saying the starting ratings are different and that's the reason for the discrepancy but you can choose your starting rating on chess.com. About Community. A place to discuss the wonderful chess site of lichess.org! Created Nov 14, 2014. r/lichess topics. Chess. Strategy game. Ancient board game. Board game. Tabletop games.On chess.com I got to 1064 in blitz putting me at around 60th percentile. On lichess a 1300 only puts me around 25th percentile. Are the rankings…Which is the best site for playing chess out of chess.com and lichess? Is chess24 and chess.com premium worth its buck? Find out in this short video giving y...Two platforms - Chess.com and Lichess - are currently dominating the online chess landscape. However, the all-important question remains - which one outshines the other? …If you are having connection/abandoned game issues on Chess.com, try Lichess. For some context: I am about a 1200-rated casual player, and over the last 6 months I have had some of the most infuriating losses since I started playing online chess. My losses were not the result of being in a bad position nor were the result of a dumb blunder.But all that doesn't make for a good reddit hivemind slogan. Lichess pretty much gives back all of the money it receives from patrons to the chess community, since it's a non profit and the main developer salary is fair. ... If you compare what rating percentile you're in on Lichess and on chess.com, it usually becomes very obvious that a huge ...It will also make you think you are awesome at chess. My rating on lichess is like 500 elo higher than chess.vo. or chess24, which are much closer in rating. So it's more fun to play on lichess and beat 1800s that it is to play on chess.com and get destroyed by 1400's. 1. Beautiful-Iron-2 • Above 2000 Elo • 7 mo. ago. This seems really low tbh. It differs a lot more than I think people like to admit. My chess.com rapid is usually the same as OTB, blitz is usually lower than OTB. Lichess is usually +300 for me. 3. JimemySWE • 1600-1800 Elo • 7 mo. ago.I use chess.com but have accounts on both. It's purely by habit though, since I started on chess.com I just keep going back. Lichess is probably the better site, the community on Chess.com is kinda mean, a lot of salty and trash talking people haha.There are many people joining the “chess.com versus lichess.org” debate on the various discussion forums. These are some of the most informative ones: Reddit: …Old Lichess was harder I think, my rating in new Lichess is higher than old Lichess (now ~2000). Haven't used chesstempo so I can't comment. Despite my complaining I still appreciate Lichess because it's free. Puzzles in lichess now with the new version are very very very good at all levels.Lichess vs chess com reddit
Maia is a human-like neural network chess engine. This version was trained by learning from over 10 million Lichess games between 1100s. Maia Chess is an ongoing research project aiming to make a more human-friendly, useful, and fun chess AI. For more information go to maiachess.com. You can also play against @maia5 and @maia9.Today I share the best chess website for your chess needs! .....Chess is hard to compute, but also not too impossible. If engines like stockfish can calculate incredibly far ahead, it's reasonable to assume that other engines can too. For the sake of discussion, let's just say the scale of computation isn't an issue because there are engines that deal with it effectively.May 24, 2021 · shanidshaan5678. May 24, 2021. 0. #1. In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit. Hamnder663. May 24, 2021. 0. #2. Lichess tries to set its average rating to 1500; chess.com generally sets its to 800. However, Lichess generally has a stronger pool of players, so the rating difference works out to typically be about 400, not 700. If I had one Elo point for every time this question gets asked, engines would never stand a chance.I made the mistake of jumping straight into a super fast game in Lichess and made awful mistakes before resigning. I took some time to relearn my things, played against the computer, and did a Blitz game of 30 minutes on the Chess.com app and won it without much difficulty, raising me from the starting 800 to 900something.1. Beautiful-Iron-2 • Above 2000 Elo • 7 mo. ago. This seems really low tbh. It differs a lot more than I think people like to admit. My chess.com rapid is usually the same as OTB, blitz is usually lower than OTB. Lichess is usually +300 for me. 3. JimemySWE • 1600-1800 Elo • 7 mo. ago.5. unwettermaschine • 8 mo. ago. lichess uses a different rating system. I'm not aware of the specifics myself but the initial rating for a new account on lichess is 1500, whereas on chess.com it's 1200 (or at least it was when I played there a long time ago). So yeah, lichess ratings are always going to be a few hundred points higher ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com vs lichess . I'm a novice and was thinking of becoming a subscribing member to chess.com for the lessons and tactics. I understand chess.com has a nicely structured lesson plan but lichess seems to have everything a absolute beginner would need for free..Hi everyone. I've been playing against the computer for years using chess.com, but have started to try lichess given the overwhelming popularity on this sub. I find it infuriating. Please help. I love the mobile board on chess.com, because I can easily hop into analysis to criticize what tactics I'm not seeing. Is this feature available on lichess?It may be as simple as: C.c is on a mission to commercialize chess for profit, whereas Lichess is on a mission to make chess free and ad-free. So these are 2 entirely different business models. Instead of paying C.c, I donate a small amount to Lichess each month to support their costs. Yeah. Chess.com is for profit and Lichess mission is to ... This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.700 on lichess is a complete beginner. You should be able to hit 1200-1500 within the first year with hard work. Chess is not easy. Give it time. greenhope42 • 1 yr. ago. That sounds about right. 700 is beginner on Lichess and 250 on chess,com would be a similar beginner level. Rating will change across time controls.chesstempo estimate via blitz tactics rating: 1576. dudeski_robinson's conversion formula: 1497. unrealduck's converter: 1277. chessgoals (via lichess classical): 1264. I don't have a FIDE rating, but given my national rating the only estimates that sound close are the last 2. 11.Right, but the first 25 moves basically match Stockfish in a novel position so it definitely has some generalization ability. Which is why I find it interesting that it then forgets the rules completelyIn 3+0 you're more likely to get away with a blunder. In 5+3, you can get very far just by giving your best and you can beat much stronger players because they don't pay attention. 3. RudeVegetable • 1 yr. ago. I have also noticed that 3+0 is a bit stronger than 3+2, and 3+2 is a lot stronger than 5+3. 3. Sinusxdx.The best thing about daily chess (online correspondence-like) is you will play book lines even if you're both less experienced, because opening book is allowed. Thus you get a chance to learn proper theory in game. You won't be playing long book lines in lower level short time formats. 8.Lower then lichess. The people in the chess.com rating pool are not the same people as in the Lichess rating pool. There’s no reason to think differences in averages would be anything but kind of random. The people are different but there are still roughly the same type of players. The huge difference suggests we are missing something here. Lichess is now 1 feature from being objectively better than chess.com and that's the identification of moves in analysis. -4. NoseKnowsAll •. Maybe you're not explaining exactly what you'd like to see, but lichess already has an engine built-in to the analysis board.For instance facing a 1500 on Chess.com is pretty manageable as long as you're thinking, but facing a 1200 on Chess Arena feels like I'm playing a 1800-2000 player from Chess.com. I'm not the best, but I've beaten a few 2000/2100 players, drawn against some national master players, and generally have no worries playing anyone under like 1500.Elo-based rating systems measure win ratios within a pool of players - that's it. (If anything, lichess ratings are more accurate than FIDE, as they use glicko2 instead of the old pure Elo rating system). Not at all. You can never compare ratings across systems, but particularly with lichess. A 1500 on lichess is likely somewhere in the 1000 ...in my experience on chess.com and lichess, good cheaters run another instance of the game on their cell phone or browser tab, or whatever, but not just following engine moves: they play themselves until the eval bar gets too far out of their favor or very in their favor, then they start using the engine moves to get out of the hole they are in ...Lichess uses the better model (defined by how accurate it predicts results). In a nutshell Lichess will be higher until rating 2100 or so. After that Lichess will be lower than chess.com. It doesn't use a better model, apparently, after a few games, you get 1 point for a win, 0 for a draw, and -1 for a loss.It has way more stuff than lichens, lessons, drills, daily puzzles, chess engine (and yes, I did do a comparison. I used the Chess.com engine against the lichess stockfish engine, and the chess.com engine reacted much faster and did better than stockfish 8 in lichess). And also, some other game modes like puzzle battle and 4 player chess. Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...Lichess inflation. Most people agree that lichess ratings are inflated by around 300-ish points. I moved to lichess from chess.com a while ago for better analysis and prep, and have gotten considerably stronger since then. I'm around 1900 lichess rapid. I'd assumed this equated to 1500-1600 chess.com.They help you identify these tactics in your games and put them to use. I have had lichess puzzles where I'm equal in material and I'm still equal in material at the end but my position is much better. As a person who tries to calculate out the line before moving, I find these puzzles are basically impossible to do.Right, but the first 25 moves basically match Stockfish in a novel position so it definitely has some generalization ability. Which is why I find it interesting that it then forgets the rules completelyin my experience on chess.com and lichess, good cheaters run another instance of the game on their cell phone or browser tab, or whatever, but not just following engine moves: they play themselves until the eval bar gets too far out of their favor or very in their favor, then they start using the engine moves to get out of the hole they are in ...That's pleasantly surprising :D. mister_XYZ42 1 yr. ago. My blitz rating on both chess.com and lichess is around 2300 while OTB I am 2100 FIDE. Hope that helps. TooUnderOverrated. The gap becomes narrower at higher levels (and grows again at godly levels - Magnus isn't 3300 FIDE). Not that much of a difference I see.The engine will take you through your mistakes and blunders and you can try to correct them. Its a lot less intuitive and helpful than the coach feature on chess.com but its something. Lichess could be a lot better from a UI/UX perspective but im guessing they are operating with less than 5% of the resources chess.com has.This website has a very handy chart for comparison that I use. On both sites you're above median by about 200 points. Weirdly enough my rapid rating on Lichess is 100 higher than yours, but 300 higher on Chess.com. A conversion chart I found would put 1800 at 1450 on Chess.com, so I think we're both probably a bit underrated on Chess.com.The Comparison. Overall, not a huge fan of either site’s UX for these features but Chess.com’s flow and UI is a bit more intuitive than Lichess’s and the friends list is a great addition ...The Comparison. Overall, not a huge fan of either site’s UX for these features but Chess.com’s flow and UI is a bit more intuitive than Lichess’s and the friends list is a great addition ...r/chess • D Gukesh becomes youngest player to beat Carlsen online (as per commentary team) beating record of Pragg. The moment when his blunder dawned on to Magnus, he has given us an absolute collection of potential meme facial expressions.So e.g. level five is listed as 2000 rating. It lists the estimated Elo next to the username when you play a particular computer opponent. Stockfish level 2 is listed as 1100, level 3 I believe is 1400. Honestly, your post is surprising, because I'm a slightly higher ELO than you against humans (~1100), yet I can barely ever beat stockfish 3.Many people prefer lichess due to the variety of options it offers, and also because it's open source and ad-free. Chess.com got a big advantage by claiming the website name early. I personally use chess.com, I'm just used to it and I think it looks cleaner. If you just wanna play chess, it pretty much doesn't matter, but for good options ...Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community. That's pleasantly surprising :D. mister_XYZ42 1 yr. ago. My blitz rating on both chess.com and lichess is around 2300 while OTB I am 2100 FIDE. Hope that helps. TooUnderOverrated. The gap becomes narrower at higher levels (and grows again at godly levels - Magnus isn't 3300 FIDE). Not that much of a difference I see.The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, advertising links (including YouTube chess tutorial videos without context), and memes is not allowed.We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with.It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.From today (Wednesday 9th March 2022), users with a public and vocal jingoistic pro-war position will no longer be eligible to receive prize money from official Lichess events. Lichess will not offer any official support for events held by the Chess Federations of Russia or Belarus, although it will not ban those federations from the site.So grosso modo the ranking difference between lichess and chess dot com is about 400 points. It's more like 200-300 points unless you're very low rated. The higher rated you are, the smaller the difference is. It's almost exactly 300 point difference at lichess 1200, but then at 2300 it's exactly 200 points.Lichess is just a better layout and chess.com seems to have more cheaters on it. Chess.com also wants money for legit everything including tactics, and chess.com is more American than worldy. Lichess has the anonymous option for when you want a quick consequence less challenge, and you end up playing people all over the planet. 99. 60. r/chess. Join. • 21 days ago. Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."shanidshaan5678. May 24, 2021. 0. #1. In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit. Hamnder663. May 24, 2021. 0. #2.whiteknight1968. Mar 12, 2023. 0. #241. "That's actually crazy since the average 1500 on chess.com is rated around 1850 in Rapid on Lichess." "Rapid" on Lichess is anything slower than blitz and less than 30/0; "Rapid" here includes 30/0 and even 60/0. Which is dumb.64 game match between the new Stockfish 14 and Lichess's level 8 AI. When Stockfish 14 was released to the public almost 3 weeks ago, I decided to test it out against Lichess's highest level computer, their level 8 AI. Two of the games had each engine play each other from the starting position, while the other 62 came from the opening choices ...Chessdotcom and Danny Rensch say that he was auto-banned and later exonerated after manual review. I think this shows that their system prefers false positive classifications because clearly Alireza wasn’t cheating. I don’t see how that’s a controversial opinion. -2.950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz. They help you identify these tactics in your games and put them to use. I have had lichess puzzles where I'm equal in material and I'm still equal in material at the end but my position is much better. As a person who tries to calculate out the line before moving, I find these puzzles are basically impossible to do.Chess.com vs lichess I'm a novice and was thinking of becoming a subscribing member to chess.com for the lessons and tactics. I understand chess.com has a nicely structured lesson plan but lichess seems to have everything a absolute beginner would need for free..Lichess is just picking from its normal tactics pool, using some mysterious and incorrect formula to determine what is an endgame. I clicked your link and it gave me a middlegame checkmate (both sides had queen, knight, rook, both kings castled and 6 pawns each). Chesstempo is based on tablebases. The system scans human games to find positions ...Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app. For me, $100 a year is definitely worth it for the value I get from chess.com. I understand why people don't like it, but it's been by far the number 1 reason I've improved over the last 9 months. I think the new system is incredible and I'd pay $100 just for that feature.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess vs chess.com vs chess24 . The definite chess website Which is the best? votes Chess.com Lichess Chess24 Voting closed Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient ...I wouldn't say it's good for anyone who cares about chess, but a chess.com 1200 would absolutely destroy anyone who just knows the rules and plays rarely. Even at 1100 you're in the 80th percentile on chess.com, which probably means you're better than 99% of all the people in the world who know how the pieces move.Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community. As you get closer to 1500 it becomes 500 point difference a s the collapsing point is around 2300 lichess. Edit Chesscom. For FIDE take away another 200 is what I hear consistently. It's not perfect but this site has I think the most realistic comparison of the most popular rating systems.This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.I made the mistake of jumping straight into a super fast game in Lichess and made awful mistakes before resigning. I took some time to relearn my things, played against the computer, and did a Blitz game of 30 minutes on the Chess.com app and won it without much difficulty, raising me from the starting 800 to 900something.Basically, I played some chess after a long time off (many months) bc of school etc. I used to be 2200ish lichess rapid — I made a chesscom account for fun and pretty easily got to above that rating in the rapid pool, where “2200”s were dropping basic knight forks and basic deflection tactics with plenty of time on the clock, in pretty simple positions.Lichess has Puzzle Storm, Puzzle streak, puzzle racer which are all free. It's crazy that chess.com put puzzles behind a paywall. The ethos and product of Lichess is so much better, and the game mechanics are so much cleaner. Chess.com feels so clunky, and I lag all the time.That my lichess blitz is way lower than it “should” be (I really blow at blitz, and most people on Lichess with an equal-ish classical rating have a much higher blitz rating, I’ve noticed) and 2. that my USCF rating is a bit low (which I suspected previously because I play relatively well against people ~300-400pts higher than me both OTB and at clubs, these …. Wotlk feral druid leveling talents